Series / Media Bias Exposed

Media Bias Exposed

The same treatment for other outlets: CNN, Forbes, Electrek, The Australian, and the BBC beyond Tesla.

6 posts, oldest first.

Media Bias Exposed

Not Tesla-related this time. But it's the SAME pattern.

The BBC tells you it's IMPARTIAL.

Its own education site, BBC Bitesize, is used by 1.7 MILLION pupils a week.

Children aged 11 to 14 were given a game where choosing "open borders" and an AMNESTY for illegal migrants won points.

Pupils worried about migrants taking local jobs were told that was "PREJUDICED".

They were encouraged to join Amnesty International.

A page celebrated progressive icons like Greta Thunberg.

Then the Mail on Sunday exposed it.

Now those pages say "This content is currently under review".

A former BBC TV controller called them "BLATANT breaches of impartiality".

Not one side of the debate. ONLY one side.

Aimed at CHILDREN.

Paid for by YOUR licence fee.

That's not education. That's BIAS.

Evidence & sources

View on X →
Media Bias Exposed

The Australian sat in the future.

Then called it the WORST part of its week.

They called it "Trump Gold".

FACT: Tesla showed the gold Cybercab in OCTOBER 2024. Before the election. Before Trump took office.

Tesla's designer called it the FUTURE version of the New York YELLOW CAB.

They said they "can't call it a car".

FACT: Cybercabs have been taking PAID rides in Austin since September.

Tesla's driverless fleet has passed ONE MILLION unsupervised miles.

Tesla now runs more robotaxis in Austin than Waymo.

Around 931 Tesla robotaxis are registered in Texas.

They're dreading it on Sydney's streets.

FACT: Australians have used FSD Supervised since 2025.

Tesla's data from 132 MILLION km on Australian roads shows these cars had a SEVENTH of the crashes.

Zurich Insurance now gives Tesla FSD drivers CHEAPER premiums.

Even the column admits it's LIKELY in Sydney by next year.

The future arrived in gold.

The Australian called it the worst part of its week.

That's not journalism. That's FEAR.

Quotes or links to: post on X

View on X →
Media Bias Exposed

CNN's headline: Musk is the largest disclosed donor in modern American politics.

Same article, much further down: the Democrat he's up against has raised $146m, more than 6x his rival's $22.3m.

It only became news when Musk started donating.

Quotes or links to: post on X

View on X →
Media Bias Exposed

Electrek's editor: Musk is "buying the midterms" because he's "afraid of democracy".

In 2020, Bloomberg spent over a BILLION of his own cash on a short campaign.

Billionaire political spending is only a crisis when it's Elon 😉

Quotes or links to: post on X

View on X →
Media Bias Exposed

Forbes headline: Cybercab "probably not unsupervised".

Remote staff helping when a car gets stuck? Every robotaxi has that, Waymo included.

Someone watching every Cybercab full time? No proof, just a guess. But a guess is enough for an article.

Would Forbes run a Waymo story on a guess?

Quotes or links to: post on X

View on X →
Media Bias Exposed

Forbes writer Brad Templeton just got a Community Note.

What he got wrong:
• Tesla told Senator Markey remote operators only step in as a rare last resort, at 2 mph, not on normal trips.
• He knew about that limit and waved it away with "others have alleged".
• He wrote that regulators forced Tesla to drop the Full Self-Driving name, yet it's still sold as Full Self-Driving (Supervised).
• He called Tesla the only robocar company with remote driving, then admitted Baidu has it too.
• He called Tesla "a Nazi-associated brand" over a "my heart goes out to you" gesture.

What he never answered:
• Where's the correction he promised if I found a factual error?
• Why does his evidence section open with "you don't need evidence for that"?
• What's wrong with how FSD is marketed now?
• Where did he write that the Nazi claims were wrong?

Quotes or links to: post on X

View on X →